Presidents And Immigration Policies: 1961-2001

From the 1960s to the turn of the 21st century, 8 Presidents pursued varying immigration policies.

All of the eight Presidents promoted pro immigration policies, a major change from earlier policies, with the exception of Bill Clinton.

John F. Kennedy advocated immigration reform, and opposed the discrimatory national origins system that had been in effect since the 1920s. He made attempts to advance serious reforms, but was stopped in his brief Presidency from accomplishing his open minded attitude toward immigration.

Lyndon B. Johnson advocated and signed into law the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, signing the new legislation in a ceremony at the Statue of Liberty, a massive reform that revolutionized migration of immigrants from around the world, as part of his “Great Society” programs. The National Origins formula since the 1920s was abolished, and a family based system was established.

The special preference for Northern and Western European migration was now expanded to include Southern and Eastern European, Latin American, Asian, and African immigration, vastly changing over time the demographic mix of the nation. This was seen as part of the changing political climate, in the time of the Civil Rights Movement of the era.

Richard Nixon generally pursued what Johnson had accomplished, and arranged for admission of Vietnam War refugees to come to America, and Gerald Ford continued the policies, including passage of the Indochina Migration and Refugee Assistance Act of 1975.

Jimmy Carter continued the same pattern of openmindedness toward immigrants and refugees, including passage of the Refugee Act of 1980.

Further reforms occurred under Ronald Reagan, with amnesty for three million undocumented immigrants, under the Immigration and Control Act of 1986. In his Farewell Address in 1989, he applauded the importance and signicance of permitting immigrants into the nation as as advancement of America’s role in the world.

George H. W. Bush further expanded immigration reform, first promoted by Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, with passage of the Immigration Act of 1990.

This expanded legal immigration and promoted a diversity lottery, which included allowing migration of homosexuals, which had been prevented in the Johnson 1965 law.

Under Bill Clinton, with a Republican Congress in control in both houses for the first time in 40 years, restrictions on illegal immigration, under the Illegal Immigration Reform And Immigrant Responsibility Act in 1996, were put into place.

Deportation proceedings led to removal actions on a large scale. Bars to re-entry in the nation were instituted, and establishment of barriers on the US-Mexico Border were promoted.

So after more than three decades of immigration reform, new restrictons were being imposed in the mid to late 1990s.

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 1921-1961

Tragically, the four decades between the Presidency of Warren G. Harding until the end of the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidency, saw the promotion of anti immigrant legislation and actions.

National Origins quotas were established in 1921, and then, under Calvin Coolidge, in 1924, a very restrictive immigration law, the Immigration Act, was passed.

The legislation strictly limited Catholic and Jewish immigration from southern and eastern European nations, and totally banned Japanese immigration, along with the continuation of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.

This law would make it nearly impossible for Jews to escape Nazi Germany, and being denied admission to America, and Italians, trying to escape Fascist Italy, faced the same tragic fate, causing many millions of deaths.

The coming of the Great Depression in 1929 and after did not convince Herbert Hoover, who like his two earlier Republican predecessors in the 1920s, were totally isolationist and pacifist to the extreme extent.

Under Franklin D. Roosevelt, Executive Order 9066 in February 1942, after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, authorized detention and internment of over 100,000 Japanese Americans and Japanese immigrants during World War II, which was later authorized by the Supreme Court.

While some European immigrants were allowed in, Jews were not able to escape to America, and this contributed to the horrors of the Holocaust in Europe, which killed about 6 million Jews and 7 million others who wished to escape, but were unable to do do.

Even more horrendous was the Supreme Court case in December 1944, Korematsu V. US, which upheld the internment of the Japanese Americans as a militarily essential action of the federal government in wartime conditions, by a 6-3 vote.

It is considered one of the worst Supreme Court decisions in American history, and in 2018, in US V. Hawaii, the Supreme Court overruled the Korematsu decision, after 74 years.

However, on the same day as Korematsu, which divided the Court, the decision on Ex Parte Endo, all Japanese detainees were ordered released, a confusing situation created by the Supreme Court, one of its most degrading moments in its entire history.

Under the Civil Liberties Act of 1988, the Japanese Americans who were still alive, gained reparations for their imprisonment, an action supported by President Ronald Reagan near the end of his time in office.

Under President Harry Truman, he vetoed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, but both houses of Congress passed it over his veto, in a time of the Second Red Scare and McCarthyism.

There were new restrictions on migration, particularly against those who professed Socialist or Communist beliefs, but also strict quotas on many people of different nationalities.

Finally, under President Dwight D. Eisenhower, mistreatment of Mexican nationals, which had gone on for decades, led to the derogatory term or slur “Wetback” being utilized in “Operation Wetback” in 1954-1955.

This led to deportation to Mexico of about 250,000 individuals by the US Border Patrol, a controversy much ignored since, but a stain on basic civil liberties, and a clearcut violation of human and civil rights.

Overall, under enforcement actions authorized by Eisenhower, over 1.1 million Mexicans were forcibly returned to Mexico by land and by sea in the year 1954, much beyond the actions alone of the US Border Patrol. And immigration quotas for all groups were strictly enforced in the Eisenhower Era.

So over these four decades from the 1920s to the end of the 1950s, overall, immigrants were treated very harshly, and without a sense of humanity—whether Asian immigrants; Jewish and Catholic immigrants; or Mexican and other Latin American immigrants.

This was a terrible violation of what the Statue of Liberty, which was given by France to the United States in 1886, promoted as the Open Door to America for those around the world who were escaping persecution and poverty, and seeking opportunity and a new lease on life in America.

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 1861-1921

This is the second of four entries on Presidents and Immigration Policies, covering the years 1861-1921, from Abraham Lincoln through the administration of Woodrow Wilson.

Under Abraham Lincoln, immigration was encouraged, with many immigrants, particularly German nationals, participating in Civil War military battles, and the Homestead Act of 1862 actively recruited immigrants.

The same pro immigration policies were pursued with the growth of industrial expansion, under Andrew Johnson, Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, and James A. Garfield.

Sadly, however in the Presidency of Chester Alan Arthur, anti Chinese hatreds led to the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882, the first major racial immigration restriction in American history, legislation that was renewed and continued as policy until American participation in World War II in 1943.

Grover Cleveland continued a similar policy and under Benjamin Harrison, the US Government established federal control of immigration, under the Immigration Act of 1891.

Similar restrictive policies toward Chinese and other Asian immigration continued under William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, and William Howard Taft with talk about “True Americanism” under Roosevelt.

Under Woodrow Wilson, restrictive immigration legislation on literacy tests was passed over his veto, amid growing fear of Catholic and Jewish immigration being perceived as a danger to America. And Wilson was very much a denier of basic civil liberties, and his open racism was made clear as promoting restrictions.

Tragically, massive restrictions on immigration and open anti Catholic and anti semitic beliefs would become dominant starting in the 1920s through 1965, the subject of the next entry on Presidents and Immigration Policies.

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 1789-1861

The issue of immigration has been a divisive part of American History from the beginning of the nation under the Constitution in 1789.

Between the Presidency of George Washington and James Buchanan (1789-1861), the general policy was Pro Immigration, with the major exception of John Adams’ Presidency 1797-1801, where the Alien and Sedition Acts were signed and enforced.

Then, that discriminatory legislation was repealed under his successor, Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809), although Jefferson at times expressed concern about the trend of immigration expansion.

French immigration was the major issue that led Adams to support and sign limitations on immigrants, and enforcing a 14 year reqirement to apply for citizenship.

Later Presidents through James Buchanan encouraged immigration, although in the late 1840s and 1850s, there was growing nativism toward Catholic immigrants from Ireland and the German states.

This was based on fear of the Pope being a threat to the heavily Protestant religion of the vast majority of Americans.

So there were some urban riots and violence against the fear of Catholic migration.

The Problematical Senator John Fetterman, Who Could Prevent A Democratic Majority In The US Senate, Even If Democrats Gain Four Seats To A Majority

Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has become a growing problem for the party, as his commitment to his job as a Senator, and his commitment to the Democratic Party, is becoming an alarm bell.

Since Fetterman had a stroke in 2022 before the election for the Senate, and was in a mental hospital for clinical depression for two months in early 2023, his behavior and personality have changed dramatically, with former staff members claiming he has displayed erratic behavior.

Fetterman fails to meet his constituents in town halls or appear at important meetings inside and outside the Senate.

His behavior, including wearing inappropriate clothing (hoodie, sweatshirt and shorts) in the Senate and elsewhere, marks him as an oddity, and as a gadfly, and he has expressed discontent with the party that elected him to the Senate in 2022.

It makes many of his colleagues and many others to wonder if at some point, if the Democrats were to win a gain of four seats in November 2026, that he might switch parties to the Republicans, destroying the ability of Democrats to control the majority, and pursue their agenda and investigate the corruption, scandals, and power grabbing of President Donald Trump.

Many former Senate staff members have reported on his lack of interest in doing his job as a Senator, and have pointed out that his major goals seem to be to cultivate relationships with conservative media figures, and advocate for the Israeli government, despite their endless war against Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

Fetterman has become an unreliable gadfly, and a “lone wolf” that reminds many of Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who often worked against their Democratic colleagues.

As Lieutenant Governor (2019-2023) under Governor Tom Wolf, he did not get along with the governor, and Wolfe continued to express issues with Fetterman’s behavior and poor approach in dealing with the Democratic Party and with constituents.

Newly elected Governor Josh Shapiro, since 2023, has also had issues with Fetterman and his unwillingness to conform to normal standards and interactions with his party and the state government.

Fetterman has often supported Donald Trump, on his pursuit of control of Greenland, and most notably, the Iran War.

There are at least three present or former members of the House of Representatives delegation, who are seen as potential challengers for Fetterman in the upcoming 2028 Senate race:

Conor Lamb (2018-2023) who lost to Fetterman in the Senate primary in 2022; Brendan Boyle since 2015; and Chris DeLuzio since 2023.

It seems certain there will be a primary battle for this Pennsylvania Senate seat in 2028, and the question is whether Fetterman will have switched to the Republican Party before that election, as he is seen as totally unreliable and unstable.

An All Time Record Of Eight African American Candidates For Governor In Midterm Elections Of 2026!

In the midst of the Trump Administration being involved in massive attacks on Civil Rights, an all time record of eight African American candidates to become Governors of their states are competing in the Midterm Elections of 2026.

Only three elected Democratic Governors have ever served—Douglas Wilder in Virginia (1989-1993); Deval Patrick in Massachusetts (2007-2015); and Wes Moore, finishing his first term as Governor of Maryland (2023-2027) and seeking reelection, and rumored to be a future Presidential contender in 2028.

Additionally, New York Lieutenant Governor David Paterson succeeded to the Governorship (2008-2010), after Governor Eliot Spitzer resigned due to scandals, that marred his brief Governorship, but Patterson had corruption issues arise, and he did not run to be elected in 2010.

Several African American candidates for Governor have lost, including: Democrats Stacey Abrams in Georgia to Brian Kemp in 2018 and 2022 and Shawn Wilson in Louisiana to Jeff Landry in 2023; and Republicans Daniel Cameron in Kentucky to Andy Beshear in 2023; Mark Robinson in North Carolina to Josh Stein in 2024; and Winsome Earl-Sears in Virginia to Abigail Spanberger in 2025.

In the 2026 Midterm Elections, there are five Democrats and three Republicans running for Governor, with several believed to be likely to win.

The most likely successes will be Wes Moore, running for relection in Maryland; David Crowley in Wisconsin; Aaron Ford in Nevada; and Keisha Lance Bottoms in Georgia, all Democrats; and Byron Donalds, in Florida, a Republican.

Republican John James in Michigan; Democrat Jermaine Johnson in South Carolina; and Republican Lisa Demuth in Minnesota are considered long shots, unlikely to win.

Historically, Midterm Elections Favor Party Opposing The President!!

With the Midterm Congressional Elections of 2026 now two months away, the odds look good for Democrats to regain control of the House of Representatives and the US Senate under Republican President Donald Trump.

The Republicans are trying to argue that such will not happen, but history tells us this is a normal scenario throughout most of history, particularly since 1946, the first midterm after World War II.

The only times that this scenario did not occur was in 1998 under Bill Clinton, and 2002 under George W. Bush.

In 1998, the Democrats actually gained 4 seats in the House, and kept the 45 seats they had in the Senate, so the Republicans actually gained nothing in that election year, although they continued to have control of both houses of Congress.

In 2002, with September 11 being an influential factor, the Republican Party actually gained 8 seats in the House, and 2 seats in the Senate, therefore actually gaining control of the upper chamber after being in the minority previously.

But otherwise, the party out of power in Congress ended up gaining control in 1946, with Republicans gaining control of both houses of Congress under Harry Truman, with Democrats losing 54 seats in the House and 10 in the Senate.

In 1950, Truman’s Democratic Party kept control of Congress, but lost 28 seats in the House and 5 seats in the Senate.

Under Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1954, the Republicans lost control of both houses of Congress, which they had won in 1952, losing 18 seats in the House and 2 seats in the Senate.

In 1958, Eisenhower saw a loss of 48 seats in the House and 12 seats in the Senate.

In 1962, in the midst of the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Democrats lost 4 seats in the House of Representatives, but gained 4 seats in the US Senate.

In 1966, in the midst of the Vietnam War under Lyndon B. Johnson, the Democrats lost 47 seats in the House, and 3 seats in the Senate, but still had massive margins.

Under Richard Nixon, in 1970, 12 Republican seats were lost in the House, but 2 seats were gained in the Senate.

Under Gerald Ford in 1974, in the midst of the Watergate Scandal and the resignation of Richard Nixon, the Republicans lost 48 seats in the House and 4 seats in the Senate.

Under Jimmy Carter in 1978, Democrats lost 15 seats in the House and 2 seats in the Senate, but retained control of both houses of Congress.

Under Ronald Reagan in 1982, Republicans lost 26 seats in the House and no seats in the Senate. Then, in 1986, Republicans lost 5 seats in the House, and lost 8 seats in the Senate, losing control of that chamber it had gained in 1980.

Under George H. W. Bush in 1990,, the Republicans lost 8 seats in the House and 1 seat in the Senate.

Under Bill Clinton in 1994, the Democrats lost control of both houses as part of the “Republican Revolution”, losing 54 seats in the House and 9 seats in the Senate. Then, in 1998, a surprise as Democrats gained 4 seats in the House and no change in the Senate, while the Republicans kept control.

Under George W. Bush in 2002, after September 11, the Republicans gained 8 seats in the House and two seats in the Senate, gaining the majority in the Senate. But in 2006, Republicans lost control of both houses of Congress, losing 32 seats in the House and 6 seats in the Senate.

Under Barack Obama in 2010, the Democrats lost the massive number of 63 seats in the House, and 6 in the Senate, losing control of the House to the Republicans. In 2014, the Democrats lost 13 seats in the House and 9 seats in the Senate, losing control of the Senate to the Republicans.

Under Donald Trump’s first term, in 2018, the Republicans lost control of the House, losing 41 seats, but gained two seats in the Senate, and retained the majority in the Senate.

Finally, under Joe Biden in 2022, Democrats lost control of the House by 9 seats, but gained one in the Senate, and kept control.

In 2026, two months from now, we will see what transpires.

.

Potential Democratic Presidential Contenders In The Presidential Election of 2028

Yesterday, this author and blogger outlined and discussed the potential list of Republican Presidential contenders in the Presidential Election of 2028.

Today, we will outline the list of potential Democratic Presidential contenders, which is much longer a list than the 13 Republicans seen as likely to run in 2028 primaries.

In no special order, the list includes the following, a total of 21 potential nominees:

Senator Jon Ossoff of Georgia
Senator Raphael Warnock of Georgia
Governor Wes Moore of Maryland
Former Vice President Kamala Harris of California
Outgoing Governor Gavin Newsom of California
Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania
Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York
Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona
Former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg (now from Michigan)
Governor JB Pritzker of Illinois
Governor Andy Beshear of Kentucky
Outgoing Governor Jared Polis of Colorado
Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey
Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan
Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut
Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona
Former Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emanuel
Congressman Ro Khanna of California
Outgoing Governor Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan
Former Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo of Rhode Island
Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland

So in total, there are 21 potential Democratic Presidential contenders two months before the Midterm Elections of 2026.

Eight on the list are US Senators; Seven are Governors; Three are former Executive appointments; Two are members of the House of Representatives; and former Vice President Kamala Harris finishes the list.

Also, five contenders are from crucial “Swing States”, Georgia (Ossoff, Warnock); Arizona (Kelly, Gallego); and Pennsylvania (Shapiro); and one is from a “red state”, Kentucky (Andy Beshear).

Whether all of this list will actually announce is unlikely, but a large number will do so.

So in summary, the list of contenders are a total of 34, with 21 Democrats and 13 Republicans.

Two Months Before The Midterm Elections Of 2026, The Republican Race For The Presidential Nomination Is In Full Swing!

It is two months until the Midterm Elections Of 2026, but already, it can be said the battle for the Republican Presidential nomination in 2028 is in full swing.

It has been generally assumed that Vice President JD Vance is the clearcut frontrunner, but there are signs that Donald Trump might swing his support to someone else, and Trump’s ultimate endorsement could change the complexion of the race.

It seems that a number of potential candidates are already starting to appeal to Trump, while others seem ready to run even without Trump’s backing.

So considering the reality that Donald Trump is in clear mental decline, and is not in the best health, at any time, Vice President JD Vance could succeed to the Presidency.

If that happens anytime before the primaries in 2028 and the Republican National Convention, Vance would be the clear choice for the nomination.

But if fate keeps Trump in the White House, there are wide possibilities of a large number of potential Republican candidates besides Vance.

The list would include:

Secretary of State Marco Rubio
Secretary of Defense (War) Pete Hegseth
Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

It would seem all three would be vying for Trump to endorse them, but if they announced, they would have to leave the Cabinet.

Outside the Cabinet, the list would include:

Senator Ted Cruz of Teas
Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri
Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky
Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas
Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida, who is leaving office in January
Former Governor Glenn Youngkin of Virginia
Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia, who is leaving office in January

Additionally, not in office are:

Donald Trump, Jr.
Tucker Carlson

So the number of potential contenders is, at this point, 13 in number.

Donald Trump’s War On The Environment, Science, Health

President Donald Trump has declared war on the environment, science, and public health.

Trump is trying to allow industrial development and oil and gas leases on public lands, threatening not just the natural beauty of our national parks and other wilderness areas, but also violating the sacred lands of many indigenous tribes.

Trump is also undermining scientific research, through cancellation of grants for scientists, and denial of major research funds for many leading universities.

And Trump, through his diabolical Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., is putting all Americans’ public health needs, including vaccines, in dire danger.

Already, the disease of Measles, which had been declared no longer a threat to public health decades ago, is showing up in hundreds of cases in many states, due to RFK Jr’s anti vaccine campaign, threatening many children, and already causing some tragic deaths.

The drain by firings and resignations of top environment experts, scientists, and doctors and nurses, is threatening long term damage to areas of public policy, that once were considered inviolable areas to undermine.

Elon Musk and the now ended DOGE (Department Of Government Efficiency) caused massive harm in its aim to cut federal spending, and has helped create the crisis that has developed in these crucial areas of the environment, science, and public health.