Trump Travel Ban

Presidents And Immigration Policies: 2001-2026

The last four Presidents—George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden—saw more pro immigration policies, with the extreme exception of Donald Trump in both separate terms.

George W. Bush, similar to his father before him, promoted the general idea of the need for further immigration reform, but the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, caused him to promote extreme security measures due to the unprecedented crisis.

But Bush also supported the concept of the DREAM Act (Development, Relief, and Education For Alien Minors), which gave illegal immigrant minors the right to avoid being deported, but it suffered from great opposition from the majority of Republicans, so it only, finally, came to fruition under his successor, Barack Obama.

Under Barack Obama, the DREAM Act finally passed, and Obama also initiated by executive action the DACA program,(Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals), which by 2017, had registered 740,000 individuals.

Obama also tried to promote DAPA (Deferred Action For Parents Of Americans And Lawful Permanent Residents) from 2014 through 2016, but it was prevented by Republican opposition, and then dropped by Donald Trump in 2017. At the same time, Obama also had record deportations of undocumented immigrants, estimated at more than three million people.

Donald Trump, in his first term, worked to build an expansion of the Border Wall with Mexico; imposed a travel ban on people from a wide variety of nations, particularly outside of Europe and the Americas; dramatically reduced refugee admissions; and promoted family separations.

Many children were left without presence of their parents, while in detention before deportation. These policies caused massive outrage and resistance.

Under Joe Biden, Trump policies on immigration were reversed; there were increased refugee admissions to the nation; and there was restored DACA (Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals).

Upon Trump’s return to the Presidency, a totally anti-immigrant policy was pursued, including declaring a national emergency; promotion of greater border militarization with Mexico; and massive mass deportation operations, setting a goal of 3,000 immigrants per day to be arrested and sent to detention centers with horrendous conditions.

Major court cases led to lots of litigation to stop what was seen as a basic violation of civil and human rights, but with total determination by the Department of Homeland Security and the US Border Patrol to accelerate millions of immigrants being removed from the country, and with many being sent to nations they had no background in their earlier lives, and not having even the same language to be able to communicate.

Often citizens as well as undocumented immigrants, particularly those who are Latinos, or really, any person of color, have been removed, and the pace of deportation has accelerated, as the Trump Administration denies any mistreatment, and often ignores court decisions or lawsuits.

What the Trump Administration has done is the worst anti immigration policy since the internment of 125,000 Japanese Americans during World War II under Franklin D. Roosevelt; and Operation Wetback against Mexican nationals in the mid 1950s under Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Judicial Intervention Against Trump On Travel Bans, Sanctuary Cities, Transgenders In The Military: The Judiciary Vs. Donald Trump For Now, But Future Is Gloomy

It is due to several federal district court judges, appointed by Republican Presidents George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush, and Democratic Presidents Jimmy Carter. Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama, that the worst violations of the Constitution by Donald Trump have been prevented from being fulfilled.

On Trump’s travel bans against Muslims and others from several nations; on penalties against “sanctuary cities” which protect undocumented immigrants; and on banning transgender soldiers in the military, these judges have denounced the President for unconstitutional actions, and have been able to stop his destructive tendencies.

Eventually, the circuit courts and the Supreme Court will have to deal with much of the damage Trump has wrought, and there is no certainty of the outcome.

And Trump and the Republican Party in the Senate are in the process of ramming through a large number of judicial appointments, only needing 51 votes to confirm nominees.

These nominees in many cases are totally unqualified and augur a time of incompetent judges who will do great damage to the constitutional norms that Americans are accustomed to, including justice and equality of treatment under the law, which clearly, Donald Trump has no interest in enforcing.

This is another reason why the movement to force Donald Trump out of the Presidency as soon as possible is so significant for the health of the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Time For Supreme Court To Intervene, And Overturn Trump Executive Order On Travel Ban

A federal District Court judge has stopped the Trump executive order travel ban for the time being, but it is being appealed by the Trump Administration, meanwhile causing chaos, as the future of the order is uncertain.

It is time for the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups to appeal to the Supreme Court, and find at least one Justice willing to put his or her neck out to use their influence to stop the travel ban permanently, and have the entire Supreme Court consider the ban immediately.

I would propose that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the true hero of progressivism, do so, and force the issue.

We know that Trump hates Ginsburg, and has tried to bully her into retirement, but she is a tough lady, who will not be intimidated.

But it would be perfect for the 84 year old Justice, who is less than 5 feet tall, to challenge BULLY Trump, and give his executive order a “Punch in the Mouth”!

Of course, no one can be sure what the eight member Court would do, but it seems highly likely that besides Ginsburg, we would have Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elana Kagan join her, making for at least a tie vote.

And somehow, it seems also likely that the “swing vote” on the Court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, would also join these four Justices, making for a 5-3 vote.

So bring it on, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, intervene and make for a confrontation with Donald Trump!