Civil Disorder

The Long Term Crisis Of Supreme Court Legitimacy Could Tear This Nation Apart Over Next Few Decades

The US Supreme Court is entering a period which could tear this nation apart over the next few decades.

Here we are in the 21st century, and yet, the Supreme Court could be taking us back to the late 19th century Gilded Age in its constitutional decisions. Now there is a solid five member conservative majority, with the confirmation and swearing in of Brett Kavanaugh, the most contentious nominee with the closest vote in the Senate since Stanley Matthews’ appointment by President James A. Garfield in 1881.

Matthews served nearly eight years on the Supreme Court, having been nominated by President Rutherford B. Hayes, but seen at the time as too much of a “crony” of the President, so his nomination was withdrawn, but resubmitted by President James A. Garfield in 1881, and confirmed by the closest margin in history, 24-23, but with Kavanaugh the second lowest ever vote 50-48. This was the only Supreme Court appointment of Garfield, who had only served four months, when he was shot and mortally wounded by an assassin, and died in September 1881.

The concern about fairness on the part of Brett Kavanaugh however was not the same as Stanley Matthews, who was the majority opinion author in a case involving discrimination against Chinese laundries and their owners in San Francisco, with the case being Yick Wo V. Hopkins, enforcing the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. This was a step forward at a difficult time, in the year 1886, although the government had passed into law the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.

We could only hope for the kind of open mindedness on the part of Brett Kavanaugh, as occurred with Stanley Matthews’ authorship of this case, which gives him stature in Supreme Court history.

We have had Republican appointments in the past, who turned out to be surprises, including:

Earl Warren and William Brennan, appointed by Dwight D. Eisenhower

Harry Blackmun, appointed by Richard Nixon

John Paul Stevens, appointed by Gerald Ford

Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy, appointed by Ronald Reagan

David Souter, appointed by George H. W. Bush

It would be a miracle at this point if Brett Kavanaugh were to travel the same road.

In a nation becoming more minority over the next decades, and with young people and women and college educated people veering to the left, while the Supreme Court veers dramatically to the Far Right, the question is whether civil disorder is not in the making, creating a crisis atmosphere in the future decades, exactly what America’s enemies are hoping for.

Donald Trump Reaction On Tuesday Night, November 8, Crucial For Civil Order And Stability: What Will He Say And Do?

Tuesday night, the Donald Trump reaction to his impending defeat will be crucial for civil order and stability.

The question is what he will say and do, as it will make a dramatic difference on the future.

Will he be statesmanlike and concede defeat in a dignified way, as all previous Presidential election losers have done?

Or will he stir animosity and encourage civil disorder, chaos, anarchy, and violence?

If he does the latter, there is only one answer, to hold him accountable, as he is not above the law!

If he “shouts fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire”, he must be summarily charged with inciting revolution and disorder, and be arrested, charged, and convicted, and pay the price!

Trump has escaped prosecution for his many violations of the law, but now it is time to pay up for his crimes, if he causes disruption of the body politic!

Hopefully, he will recognize that his historical reputation, already in tatters, can be rehabilitated somewhat if he acts like a gentleman and a good loser.

But do NOT hold your breath expecting that, as you are likely to be disappointed!