Vote By Mail Should Be Alternative, And Should Be Offered Everywhere This November For All Elections

With the nation in the midst of the CoronaVirus Pandemic, it is essential that all states offer Vote by Mail as an alternative, making it mandatory for all elections!

As it is, about 25 percent of voters vote by mail, including this blogger and author.

People who are older; those who are disabled; those who are in hospitals, nursing homes, and other public institutions; and others who find it inconvenient to stand in lines at polls on Election Day already vote by mail.

If Donald Trump had his way, no one would vote by mail, as he knows that is the only way that a majority of people, not electoral votes, would vote for the Republican party. They make it their mission to make voting harder, and to work to undermine the right to vote for minority groups, and make voter suppression their major effort in office!

Standing online yesterday in Wisconsin, forced on voters by the Republican Party of Wisconsin and the US Supreme Court majority of conservative Republicans, was a total outrage and disgrace!

The right to vote is sacred, and no one needs to prove his residence, as long as he or she has registered to vote with proper identification. Once that has been established, we should follow Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Utah and Hawaii, all enlightened states, that have all of their elections by mail already!

Sixteen other states also have vote by mail allowed, including my state of Florida, but also California and Arizona as major centers of population. allow it.

It is time for such states as New York, Massachusetts, Virginia, Texas, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Illinois, and particularly Southern states, to spread democracy to all citizens!

9 comments on “Vote By Mail Should Be Alternative, And Should Be Offered Everywhere This November For All Elections

  1. Princess Leia April 8, 2020 12:15 pm

    Bernie is ending his campaign.

  2. Ronald April 8, 2020 12:18 pm

    Congress has NEVER canceled an election, and will NOT do so this November, specifically because Nancy Pelosi will not allow Mitch McConnell to do such!

  3. Ronald April 8, 2020 12:20 pm

    Bernie Sanders needs now to fully endorse and campaign within safety limits for Joe Biden, and Joe needs to pick his VP running mate soon, and key members of his future cabinet!

    And no Mr Nice Guy campaign, as Trump will use any tactic imaginable against Joe, so Joe and his VP choice have to conduct a “scorched earth” policy!

  4. Jeffrey Moebus April 10, 2020 12:22 pm

    And You want to see voting by mail? Who going to run it: UPS?
    FedEx? Amazon Prime?

    What are Your thoughts on this development as it relates to the possibility of Election 2020 happening by mail?:

    Postal Service Warns of $22 Billion Hole From Coronavirus
    Agency already struggling with losses got $10 billion lifeline in stimulus package but says it faces far greater damage

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/postal-service-warns-of-22-billion-hole-from-coronavirus-11586463104?mod=djem10point

  5. Ronald April 10, 2020 1:07 pm

    Jeffrey, there is no excuse for allowing the US Postal Service to become defunct!

    The nation needs it, and it must happen no matter what!

  6. Former Republican April 11, 2020 10:28 am

    If the Postal Service Dies, So Does Democracy

    https://washingtonmonthly.com/2020/04/11/if-the-postal-service-dies-so-does-democracy/

    There are two big stories this week about a subject that normally sounds painfully boring: the mail. Each is crucially important in its own right, but combined they presage a nearly apocalyptic threat to American democracy.

    The first is that the Donald Trump and Republican Party are engaged in an all-out war against the expansion of mail-in voting in the era of COVID-19. The flimsy outward justification is concern about voter fraud, but of course there is no evidence of significant voter fraud surrounding mail ballots. In fact, the only major scandal in the modern era around mail-in voting was a corrupt scheme by Republicans in North Carolina—one that was quickly and easily discovered. Republicans aren’t exactly being shy about why they want to restrict the expansion of access to mail voting: they think the more people are allowed to vote, the better Democrats will do against them. It certainly doesn’t hurt that Republicans are far less concerned about the virus than are Democrats, and that in battleground states with Republican legislatures like Wisconsin, there are far more polling places per capita in red districts than blue ones, which means not only longer lines but more dangerous crowding at the polling places. It only adds to the Republican turnout advantage if most people have to vote in person.

    The opposition to mail voting is amusing given that it has traditionally been advantageous to Republicans, and even now doesn’t much benefit one party or the other. But facing electoral calamity after four years of Trump plus a disastrous epidemic response and looming recession, Republicans clearly feel their best shot at keeping power is if as few people are allowed to safely vote as possible. It’s a fundamentally immoral stance at odds with the principles of democracy itself, but unashamedly taking baldly self-serving positions contrary to previously shared values of basic decency is a hallmark of Republicanism under Donald Trump. It’s not a bug; it’s a feature.

    The second story involves the Post Office itself. The United States Postal Service is set to run out of money by September. The previous round of emergency coronavirus stimulus did not take the long-beleaguered Postal Service into account. Conservative policymakers have been eyeing the USPS with hungry privatizing chops for a long time, and have been hamstringing it with ridiculous provisions like forcing the USPS to take into account 50 years of pension payments in advance in its budget, which no other corporation or public agency has to do.

    Donald Trump loves to talk about what a “great American company” FedEx is, and conservatives would love to eliminate the postal service and give all of its operations to private shipping companies and private equity. Of course, long gone would be the days of sending a letter from coast to coast in a few days for a fraction of a dollar–but since when was that sort of thing a concern for Republicans? As with libraries, if the Postal Service didn’t already exist and you proposed it, it would be considered a ridiculous and wasteful socialist fantasy. In the modern era Republicans would make sure it never came into being, and mainstream Democrats would means-test it so that everyone would have to fill out tax statements in triplicate to make sure that no one making over a certain amount got a free mailbox.

    Are these two stories merely a coincidence? Perhaps. It is possible that just as Republicans are attempting to thwart vote-by-mail in order to reduce voter turnout in a pandemic, they also just so happen to be defunding the Postal Service.

    But what if it’s not? What if the plan is explicitly to cripple the mail system itself as yet another argument against mail-in voting, providing them an excuse to force people to vote in person in a pandemic or not vote at all? It would be a villainous plot straight out of a James Bond film. That doesn’t mean it’s not real, especially given the current administration. Even if it’s not intentional, the combined effect of both acts of bad faith would certainly be convenient for deeply unpopular conservatives whose only chance of holding onto ill-gotten power is to thwart democracy itself.

    Democrats would do well to act as if they were facing opponents with the depraved moral instincts of a Bond villain, and think proactively. Any future assistance on legislation to Trump and McConnell over the coming year should be predicated on both saving the Postal Service and ensuring access to mail-in voting across the country. An election in which one side is lulled into complacency about a pandemic and has lots of polling places available, while the other is rightfully concerned for the public good while also being crushed by long lines and crowded locations, is no true election at all. It’s a mockery of democracy and cannot be allowed to stand.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.