Six weeks ago, this blogger wrote of the move to have a woman on American currency, with the move being to replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill. In an online competition, abolitionist and runaway slave Harriet Tubman won out over Eleanor Roosevelt and Rosa Parks.
All well and good, but now the Treasury Department is proposing to replace Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill, rather than Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill.
Such an action would be totally wrong, as Hamilton is the founder of our national banking system, the most important economic figure in American history, and also the founder of a viewpoint in government—a belief in a strong national government, and a broad interpretation of the Constitution—-which in his time was considered to be “conservatism”, but in the past century since Franklin D. Roosevelt, has been seen as the view of government of the modern Democratic Party, namely “liberalism.”
Liberalism, and the alternative word “progressivism” has been the backbone of all of the major political, social and economic reforms of the past century, and Hamilton’s philosophy is something that needs to continue to be honored.
On the other hand, Andrew Jackson, while regarded as one of the more significant Presidents, destroyed the Second National Bank of the United States, a major mistake; promoted slavery and condemned abolitionists; and promoted the death of thousands of native Americans in the despicable action, known as the “Trail of Tears”, the forced removal of five Indian tribes to Oklahoma, later taken away from native Americans, when oil was discovered in Tulsa in 1889.
Ben Bernanke, the former head of the Federal Reserve, has called for just what this blogger is proposing: leave Alexander Hamilton on the $10 bill, and replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill!
Finally something we have agreed upon. If there is to be a change, why Hamilton? Not only was he responsible for everything you mentioned but he was also member of the Society for the Promotion of the Manumission of Slaves in New York. Isn’t it ironic that Hamilton should be taken out of the $10 during the Presidency of the first black President? I also agree that Jackson should be removed, especially for his pro-slavery views. But that won’t happen because then the famous Democrat Party’s Jefferson – Jackson Day Fundraiser Dinners would be very awkward, would they not? Wait a minute! Jefferson also owned slaves! I say the Democrat party should ban the Jefferson-Jackson Dinners, or change their name to Wilson-FDR! Wait a minute! Our first modern liberal progressive President, Woodrow Wilson was a racists he re-segregated the Civil Service and FDR appointed a Klansman to the SCOTUS! Oh my oh my. https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/mdpjeffjack
In the meantime yet another lie from Obama was confirmed while the the liberals are making the confederate flag an issue of utmost importance. Forget among other things $18 trillion dollars in debt, and the world burning up in flames around us. Notice how these so called reporter can’t even muster the courage to say Obama lied. Well Mika kind of did. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85Mm62-Wq7Q
Max, you conveniently forget that Hugo Black became one of the greatest and most open minded and tolerant Supreme Court Justices, despite his racist past.
There is such a thing as ability to change, and Hugo Black should be respected and honored for that, and his brilliance on the Supreme Court from 1937-1971!