The First Woman President Could Be Elizabeth Warren, Not Hillary Clinton, If Warren Were To Enter The Presidential Race!

Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts wowed the California State Democratic Convention this past weekend, and it almost seemed as if she was running for President, despite her denials.

Warren came out fighting mad about the outrageous utterances and actions of many of the Republican candidates or potential candidates, and one had to wonder how any sane person could possibly think of voting for any of them.

But there is a cynicism about Hillary Clinton, a disillusionment that she has sold out to Wall Street and the corporations; that she is not passionate and committed in the way that Warren and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders have demonstrated; that she is too hawkish in foreign policy based on her Senate record; and that her husband Bill Clinton reminds us of the 1990s, and that Hillary seems old and stale and does not enthuse voters.

Hillary is seen as representing the past, while Warren, despite being only two years younger, represents the new and the future.

Warren is exciting and dynamic, while Hillary is unexciting and stale, and that is a major problem for the Democratic Party.

If the Democrats lose the White House, the Supreme Court will be lost for the next generation, and the nation will be set back a few generations by a reactionary President.

The nation call ill afford being concerned about Hillary Clinton’s ambitions to be the first woman President, when we can have the first woman President in Elizabeth Warren!

It seems clear that Elizabeth Warren can excite the masses of Americans who want to believe in a future of progressive reform, and she can add on to the accomplishments of Barack Obama, and arouse the public to get out there and vote, in a way that will not happen with Hillary Clinton!

It is time for Elizabeth Warren to declare for the Presidency, as she can bring a future of brightness and change so desperately needed, and millions will wish to work for her election.

So, Elizabeth Warren, run, run, run!

16 comments on “The First Woman President Could Be Elizabeth Warren, Not Hillary Clinton, If Warren Were To Enter The Presidential Race!

  1. Max May 20, 2015 9:38 am

    I was wondering the following. Do you agree with those people, which are many, who would simply vote for Hillary (or Warren) because they believe its time to have a woman President? I find that astonishing. Casting one’s vote based primarily on the candidates genitals, as well as race, is preposterous, don’t you think?

  2. Ronald May 20, 2015 10:42 am

    Yes, we agree, although it would be nice to have the proper woman President.

    It seems as if we are agreeing more, do you notice, Max? HAHAHA! LOL

  3. Max May 20, 2015 2:21 pm

    LOL , amazing!

  4. Max May 21, 2015 10:22 am

    I have a feeling that Republicans are secretly hoping Hillary wins the primary. But it would be a mistake for them to just relax and not go after her thinking she alone will implode. This is because none of the lies, scandals, lack of accomplishments and illegality will in any way shape or form be taken in consideration by millions of voters who will vote anyone with the letter D next to their name. Plus there is a new generation, the millennials, who have not lived through the 90’s and have no idea of anything that went on with the Clintons. They don’t know and have not been taught about the whole “bimbo eruptions unit” that Betsy Wright headed up leading the pack of wolves (Stephanopoulos, Carville , and “forehead” Begala among them) that went out to destroy all the women that dared to speak out about Bill. Every single woman Bill had slept with was attacked by these people. The millennials have no idea of this, they never heard of Hillary’s “trailer trash” or Carville’s “you drag a dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you’ll pick up, i.e., Paula Jones” and all the nice things they said about these women just to destroy their reputation. Talk about a war on women. Yet I suspect that even if the millennials knew about all of this, conditioned as they are by the “deformed’ education received, they would still vote for Hillary.

  5. Ronald May 21, 2015 10:40 am

    WOW, are you sarcastic, Max! HAHAHA!

    Meanwhile, millions of ill informed people vote Republican because of their hate of blacks, immigrants, independent minded women, and anyone who is in a labor union, or cares about climate change. And they elect people who do not give a damn about poor whites who troop to the polls to vote against their own interests, since voting R means just do what the top one percent want, tax cuts, corporate welfare, etc.

    So, basically, we have an issue of ignorance on the part of millions of voters who do not understand politics or issues, and that is a major crisis in our country, that undermines the future of all of us except the elite one percent!

  6. Max May 21, 2015 11:30 am

    Don’t know about you, but I sat out the last two Presidential elections. I would not vote for Obama, since I never vote for a populist specially since they tend to be elitist personally, and I was disgusted at McCain and the Republican establishment. So I agree millions just are not informed and vote according to “image”, “touchy feel good feelings”, “race” or “gender”, but there are also millions of us who have no one to represent us and thus do not vote.

  7. Ronald May 21, 2015 11:58 am

    But, Max, by NOT voting, you are evading your responsibility to be part of our system, and, of course, there are no ideal choices, but you should have voted for McCain and Romney, rather than sit on the sidelines.

    As far as elitist personalities, the Democrats are not the only party that has them, as they are all around us–wealthy people who do not give a damn about us!

    But I have found that wealthy Democrats, while certainly helping themselves, have also promoted reforms that created the great middle class beginning with FDR, while the Republicans are only out, by their record, to help the elite alone, and harm the workers and average Americans who are struggling every day to survive!

  8. Max May 21, 2015 12:50 pm

    By not voting I believe I am exercising my freedom. Personally I do not see that much difference between the last two Republican Presidential candidates and the Democrat. I only see a difference of degree. McCain and Romney would just go a little slower than Obama in expanding our bureaucracy. And FYI I didn’t vote for Bush senior in his reelection bid in 92 (I voted for him after Reagan but he betrayed us) and I never voted for his son. As a matter of fact 1988 was the last time I voted for the Presidency.

  9. Ronald May 21, 2015 2:21 pm

    Well, Max, that is indeed your right to choose NOT to vote, but it is very sad.

    There are those that would say if one does not vote, one does not have the right to complain! LOL HAHAHA!

  10. Max May 21, 2015 3:18 pm

    Don’t get me wrong I always vote for Congress, even during Presidential election year, and for Governor. I just don’t choose a President.

  11. Ronald May 21, 2015 3:26 pm

    Are you going to tell me, Max, you ALWAYS find gubernatorial candidates inspiring, when I find MOST Governors of both parties horrible and obnoxious, and their opponents often worse?

    And you forget, the President gets to pick the Supreme Court and lower courts, so to say that both Presidential candidates are no good, it means you do not care about the judiciary, since that is the most important reason to pick a President!

  12. Max May 21, 2015 4:28 pm

    It’s Max. No not always, but they tend to have the power to screw my life more on a daily basis than the Federal government does, and the federal government really tries hard. So I try to vote the least harmful. And I do vote for the Federal legislature, though it really did no good whatsoever these last 5 yrs. Again, I voted to stop what I sincerely believe are destructive policies of the current administration, yet the opposition party is hardly an opposition party. Just look at the Senate today, it is as if Harry Reid (despicable personality if there ever was one) were still in charge, yet believe me, I despise McConnell and Boehner much more than I do Harry Reid.

  13. Ronald May 21, 2015 5:45 pm

    Sorry, Sam, uh Max LOL Does it matter, hahaha? LOL I have corrected my error! 🙂

  14. D May 22, 2015 8:05 am

    I agree that Elizabeth Warren should run for president of the United States. But, I’m imagining that she absolutely does not want to do that. It may be, if I’m accurate, that Elizabeth Warren may be turned off by the notion of not only running…but, if she were to become elected, the reality of actually serving in that top office. Politics in Washington, D.C. remind me of what the legendary singer/songwriter Joni Mitchell said, at some point during the 2000s, about the music industry: It’s become a “corrupt cesspool.” I don’t think too many would say differently regarding, in general, Washington, D.C.

  15. Ronald May 22, 2015 8:40 am

    Sadly, D, I agree with you, but someone with decent principles and views needs to be our President, and Warren is very appealing.

  16. Pragmatic Progressive May 22, 2015 9:41 am

    I vote for Democrats because they are more in line with my views on social and environmental issues than Republicans are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.