<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Progressive Professor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com</link>
	<description>An educated view from the left...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:29:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Washington State Bridge Collapse Another Reminder Of Need For Massive Infrastructure Investment Without Interference Of Politics! by Maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21011&#038;cpage=1#comment-87832</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21011#comment-87832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Princess!! 
       
As usual Juan Your comment is patronizing and misogynistic.
You obviously don &#039;t understand fascism.. 
The heart of Neo-Conservatism is Fascism, though I&#039;m not sure Neo-Cons, Conservatives or Republicans are aware of this. They have been fooled because they are morons and that includes you Juan! 
-----------------------------------
     Fascism and Neoconservative Republicans
March 25th, 2010 · 1 Comment · Culture, Media, Politics, wars and militarism
-------------------------------------
The word “Fascist” as with the terms “Socialist” and “Communist” are thrown around a lot by people who have no idea what they mean. If you want to know what those terms really mean, find someone who was in some branch of military counterintelligence, the CIA, the security section of the State Department, Defense Intelligence, or in the FBI.
     In all those areas, the first day of basic training involves comparative forms of government. You can’t spot a Communist if you don’t know what a Communist is. You can’t tell the difference between a Communist and a Fascist unless you know the difference in the two systems. It is Intelligence, and more specifically, Counterintelligence 101.
      So, let’s go right to Fascism. A Fascist is one who believes in a corporatist society. In other words, it is a political philosophy embodying very strong central government, with the authority to move in decisive steps to accomplish goals. It would be characterized by a unity of purpose, with more or less all the levels of the hierarchy in unison, starting at the top and working down. It is a top-down government involving an alliance of industry, military, media and a political party.
      Because Fascism has been associated with the 1930s German Nazis, the Italian Fascists under Mussolini and the Falangists, under the Spanish Dictator, Francisco Franco, the term “Fascist” has taken on a sinister meaning. Not fewer than 10 million direct deaths resulting from the rule of these three may have something to do with it. On the other hand, philosophies don’t kill people; people kill people.
      It is interesting to note that at least two of the three Parties had origins as Socialist and morphed into strong, Right Wing, authoritarian rules as a result largely of expediency. It is also interesting to note that all three were not only intimately connected to the largest industrial corporations, but as soon as possible with the military leadership. While Fascism as a political philosophy is not innately evil, given the results, it is worth noting how things turned out.
     Both the German and the Italian Fascist parties were also both revolutionary and conservative at the same time. Both Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini were aggressive, anarchic leaders. Both served time in jail. Both served in the enlisted ranks with the military in war. Both used that experience to organize mobs of thugs to agitate against an established government, not for a more democratic regime, but for a more authoritarian one. You can begin to see some similarities with contemporary political activities.
     As soon as they took power, which they did partially through gangs and mobs, intimidation and demonstrations and—in Mussolini’s case an outright coup—they allied themselves with the biggest corporations and the military general staff. In addition, even before taking complete power, they began to wrest control of the media away from other political parties, and to use it for their own propaganda.
     Once they had control of the radio and newspapers, which were then the prominent sources of information, they could begin to broadcast their messages. Hitler’s “Big Lie” basically blamed rampant inflation and lack of jobs on the Jews. (The current neo -con blame immigrants and the poor) He blamed all their economic ills on the restraint of Germany by other nations and the presumed taking over of German lands (which they themselves had only won through aggressive wars.)  
     But let’s for a minute assume that we know nothing about Fascism except that it exists. We have a group, here in America that believes in a corporatist political philosophy. What would that look like? If it were a true Fascist organization, they would ally themselves with big corporations, like the health care industry, oil and mining, pharmaceuticals, media corporations and the military-industrial complex.
     They would try to control the message, particularly in radio and television. (Fox News) 
They would become as closely allied with the top military brass as possible, offering them a seat at the table in the running of the economy. Retired Generals would be assured of positions involved with military hardware and strategic planning.
     And what about the people? In a fascist system, the whole idea is to have an efficient method of getting things done. If you want to build an “autobahn” you simply tell the transportation minister to get started. You control everything at every level. It will go faster because it is for the good of all the people, so no one will have the right to object or interfere. It is, Fascists would say, about efficiency, getting things done.
     Defense is about protecting the people. You attack other countries so that they cannot attack you. You start wars (Iraq, Afghanistan) to prevent dangerous men from attacking you. It makes sense. Military efficiency in a Fascist state means that if the top guy (President or Dictator) wants to be absolutely certain that no other country is superior, he can build up the military industry and the military at any pace or at any cost.
     In a Fascist state the idea is to have one set of rules, coming from the top down. No one votes as an individual, only as a part of the group that is assigned a task. It is corporate, total—totalitarian. So, if you decide that a national health care program is not right for the country, you all vote against it in a totally militaristic way. (Senate and House Republicans). Everyone  salutes and follows the lead from the top down. The only problem is when you do not have a strong leader. (Look at the Republicans vying for this role- Cantor, Cruz, Ryan, 
        In a Fascist state, policy is largely being written through a cooperative effort with the industries involved, in this case the health care industry. The slow, ragged, messy and Democratic process involved with our current health care reform process would never happen under a Fascist government. Whatever the decision, there would be no appeal. If a million or fifty million were left out, because, let’s say, that the President needed more money for war machines that would be the decision— with no question or appeal.
       So, if you want efficiency, you not only should you look to the Republicans, but you may have no choice. The Republicans, remember, have the complete support of Fox News, the Fox television Network, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, and any number of television stations around the country, plus somewhere between 600 and 1600 radio stations on which literally 9 out of 10 commentators are paid by those network owners to be Conservative (Neoconservative Republican.) They have expanded to very large numbers of web site bases, delivering whatever type of information they want, truth, lies, anything in between… accusations without proof, conspiracy theories, Socialist, Communist, government takeover of this or that…no need to be truthful. It is all propaganda and the way Republicans now operate. 
     Just as Herr Goebbels and Mussolini did in the 1930s—and except in the Communist counties and a few Latin American dictatorships there hasn’t been anything to speak of similar to this in the Western advanced societies since then—the unchallenged message of the Right Wing goes out. The radio commentators today get their message from the top, from the Republican Party. Fox News Channel internal memos have shown that they literally decide what policies the Republican Party wished to champion, and then they attack rather than merely delivering the news.
     So do we need to be civil about it—about these lies? Is it important to challenge people, like these Right Wing commentators who tell you that your current health care is sufficient? It is good for corporations, for health care insurance companies. But is it good for you not to be sure you can get health insurance? So if they tell you that something is a government takeover and it is not, so you vote against health care or you respond to a poll in a way that is against your own best interests…do you need to be civil about being lied to? You shouldn’t be lied to by media. You need the truth, the facts, to make decisions. Republicans do not agree with informing or educating their base with verifiable facts.
     It is a pretty simple answer. Should you be civil to people who lie to you and urge you to buy something that turns out to hurt you, or your family, or cause you to lose your job, or kill your sister, brother, neighbor? If I lie to you and say it is safe to swim across the channel and you are attacked by sharks that I knew were there…should you not care? This is what is happening, right now…today. In the consumer products market, we call that fraud and companies can be criminally liable. Republicans want to abolish all consumer protections. 
     So let’s describe what a Fascist government or a political party attempting to introduce a Fascist government would look like and see if either or any of our political parties fits that description:
     Allies with big corporations, planning strategy together, interchangeable.
     Works to have control of the political process at all levels, starting with the top down.
     Does not cooperate with and actually tries to undermine other political parties.
     Uses mobs (armed NRA members) and demonstrations, and attempts to make individuals working in other parties afraid of violent reactions.
     Advocates ownership of weapons as a fear factor to intimidate others. (Wayne La Pierre…”the people with the guns make the rules.”)
     Decides what is best for all citizens based on what corporations want.
     Uses “big lie” propaganda technique, of top-down distributed propaganda message for each issue.
      Allies with military on most issues, with ultra-aggressive military posture.
     Total control of the political process is the ultimate goal.
     If any of this seems familiar to you, then you see something “Fascist” in the current political process. Of course, one thing that wasn’t mentioned. Fascists always need someone to stigmatize. In Germany, it was the Jews. In Italy it was the Socialists. In Spain it was the Communists. It seems clear that, in this country it is the Democrats, Immigrants, Latinos, Muslims, Gays, African Americans, the poor...,
      The Neocons are out of power, but they are unrelenting in their efforts to control as much of the political discourse as possible, no matter how damaging to society. They bring mobs and riff-raff out, some with guns, trying to scare the average citizen. They send messages out over radio with lunatic commentators, some who are not even allowed to visit other countries because of their hate speech…yet we tolerate it.
     We even allow asininely preposterous lies from a possibly psychotic television commentator…to be used to stoke the race-hatred of many tea party members, and thugs against a distinguished African-American President who won 54% of the vote, the largest since Ronald Reagan and who also won the Nobel Peace Prize.
     The case is pretty clear. The Neoconservative Republicans are headed for Fascism if they are not there already. The latest round of insults, threats, lies about conspiracies, demonization of the above mentioned  population plus workers, unions, the unemployed, etc. Sooner  or later this totalitarian attitude will either be denounced or will have serious responses. One thing is sure, with the problems facing our country, we cannot afford the kind of anarchist attacks as were exhibited in the bombing of a Federal building in Oklahoma City or the flying of an aircraft into a building housing an IRS office or the Threats by gun owners to fight the current government to the death.
     This radical, violent, arrogant Fascist attitude has to stop!  The first step in preventing this kind of political outcome is to identify and react to Fascism when it appears. Neoconservative Republicanism is Fascism. Republicans must return to sanity or be treated as a very dangerous and radical political party.
http://www.populistdaily.com/politics/neoconservative-republicans-and-fascism.html
     The last person Repubs want in the White House is another government-expanding “compassionate conservative” like Bush the younger and especially NOT  a black man!
They yearn for a radical who will yank an out-of-control federal government up by its roots, or at least starve it of revenue, prune entitlements, chop away job-strangling regulation like consumer protection or environmental protection and free (or force) citizens to take more individual responsibility for their pensions and health care. Those that can&#039;t, screw them!
     I think the Republican Party is not really a party. It doesn’t stand for anything except reelecting itself. It’s a coalition of gangs….
      The Neo Cons are only oriented to an aggressive imperialistic foreign policy, a big defense establishment, and suppression of our civil liberties like voting!
     The one positive I can observe about the Republican party is that they are starting to eat their own. If we are lucky they will consume themselves and explode into a bloody mist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Princess!! </p>
<p>As usual Juan Your comment is patronizing and misogynistic.<br />
You obviously don &#8216;t understand fascism..<br />
The heart of Neo-Conservatism is Fascism, though I&#8217;m not sure Neo-Cons, Conservatives or Republicans are aware of this. They have been fooled because they are morons and that includes you Juan!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
     Fascism and Neoconservative Republicans<br />
March 25th, 2010 · 1 Comment · Culture, Media, Politics, wars and militarism<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
The word “Fascist” as with the terms “Socialist” and “Communist” are thrown around a lot by people who have no idea what they mean. If you want to know what those terms really mean, find someone who was in some branch of military counterintelligence, the CIA, the security section of the State Department, Defense Intelligence, or in the FBI.<br />
     In all those areas, the first day of basic training involves comparative forms of government. You can’t spot a Communist if you don’t know what a Communist is. You can’t tell the difference between a Communist and a Fascist unless you know the difference in the two systems. It is Intelligence, and more specifically, Counterintelligence 101.<br />
      So, let’s go right to Fascism. A Fascist is one who believes in a corporatist society. In other words, it is a political philosophy embodying very strong central government, with the authority to move in decisive steps to accomplish goals. It would be characterized by a unity of purpose, with more or less all the levels of the hierarchy in unison, starting at the top and working down. It is a top-down government involving an alliance of industry, military, media and a political party.<br />
      Because Fascism has been associated with the 1930s German Nazis, the Italian Fascists under Mussolini and the Falangists, under the Spanish Dictator, Francisco Franco, the term “Fascist” has taken on a sinister meaning. Not fewer than 10 million direct deaths resulting from the rule of these three may have something to do with it. On the other hand, philosophies don’t kill people; people kill people.<br />
      It is interesting to note that at least two of the three Parties had origins as Socialist and morphed into strong, Right Wing, authoritarian rules as a result largely of expediency. It is also interesting to note that all three were not only intimately connected to the largest industrial corporations, but as soon as possible with the military leadership. While Fascism as a political philosophy is not innately evil, given the results, it is worth noting how things turned out.<br />
     Both the German and the Italian Fascist parties were also both revolutionary and conservative at the same time. Both Adolph Hitler and Benito Mussolini were aggressive, anarchic leaders. Both served time in jail. Both served in the enlisted ranks with the military in war. Both used that experience to organize mobs of thugs to agitate against an established government, not for a more democratic regime, but for a more authoritarian one. You can begin to see some similarities with contemporary political activities.<br />
     As soon as they took power, which they did partially through gangs and mobs, intimidation and demonstrations and—in Mussolini’s case an outright coup—they allied themselves with the biggest corporations and the military general staff. In addition, even before taking complete power, they began to wrest control of the media away from other political parties, and to use it for their own propaganda.<br />
     Once they had control of the radio and newspapers, which were then the prominent sources of information, they could begin to broadcast their messages. Hitler’s “Big Lie” basically blamed rampant inflation and lack of jobs on the Jews. (The current neo -con blame immigrants and the poor) He blamed all their economic ills on the restraint of Germany by other nations and the presumed taking over of German lands (which they themselves had only won through aggressive wars.)<br />
     But let’s for a minute assume that we know nothing about Fascism except that it exists. We have a group, here in America that believes in a corporatist political philosophy. What would that look like? If it were a true Fascist organization, they would ally themselves with big corporations, like the health care industry, oil and mining, pharmaceuticals, media corporations and the military-industrial complex.<br />
     They would try to control the message, particularly in radio and television. (Fox News)<br />
They would become as closely allied with the top military brass as possible, offering them a seat at the table in the running of the economy. Retired Generals would be assured of positions involved with military hardware and strategic planning.<br />
     And what about the people? In a fascist system, the whole idea is to have an efficient method of getting things done. If you want to build an “autobahn” you simply tell the transportation minister to get started. You control everything at every level. It will go faster because it is for the good of all the people, so no one will have the right to object or interfere. It is, Fascists would say, about efficiency, getting things done.<br />
     Defense is about protecting the people. You attack other countries so that they cannot attack you. You start wars (Iraq, Afghanistan) to prevent dangerous men from attacking you. It makes sense. Military efficiency in a Fascist state means that if the top guy (President or Dictator) wants to be absolutely certain that no other country is superior, he can build up the military industry and the military at any pace or at any cost.<br />
     In a Fascist state the idea is to have one set of rules, coming from the top down. No one votes as an individual, only as a part of the group that is assigned a task. It is corporate, total—totalitarian. So, if you decide that a national health care program is not right for the country, you all vote against it in a totally militaristic way. (Senate and House Republicans). Everyone  salutes and follows the lead from the top down. The only problem is when you do not have a strong leader. (Look at the Republicans vying for this role- Cantor, Cruz, Ryan,<br />
        In a Fascist state, policy is largely being written through a cooperative effort with the industries involved, in this case the health care industry. The slow, ragged, messy and Democratic process involved with our current health care reform process would never happen under a Fascist government. Whatever the decision, there would be no appeal. If a million or fifty million were left out, because, let’s say, that the President needed more money for war machines that would be the decision— with no question or appeal.<br />
       So, if you want efficiency, you not only should you look to the Republicans, but you may have no choice. The Republicans, remember, have the complete support of Fox News, the Fox television Network, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, and any number of television stations around the country, plus somewhere between 600 and 1600 radio stations on which literally 9 out of 10 commentators are paid by those network owners to be Conservative (Neoconservative Republican.) They have expanded to very large numbers of web site bases, delivering whatever type of information they want, truth, lies, anything in between… accusations without proof, conspiracy theories, Socialist, Communist, government takeover of this or that…no need to be truthful. It is all propaganda and the way Republicans now operate.<br />
     Just as Herr Goebbels and Mussolini did in the 1930s—and except in the Communist counties and a few Latin American dictatorships there hasn’t been anything to speak of similar to this in the Western advanced societies since then—the unchallenged message of the Right Wing goes out. The radio commentators today get their message from the top, from the Republican Party. Fox News Channel internal memos have shown that they literally decide what policies the Republican Party wished to champion, and then they attack rather than merely delivering the news.<br />
     So do we need to be civil about it—about these lies? Is it important to challenge people, like these Right Wing commentators who tell you that your current health care is sufficient? It is good for corporations, for health care insurance companies. But is it good for you not to be sure you can get health insurance? So if they tell you that something is a government takeover and it is not, so you vote against health care or you respond to a poll in a way that is against your own best interests…do you need to be civil about being lied to? You shouldn’t be lied to by media. You need the truth, the facts, to make decisions. Republicans do not agree with informing or educating their base with verifiable facts.<br />
     It is a pretty simple answer. Should you be civil to people who lie to you and urge you to buy something that turns out to hurt you, or your family, or cause you to lose your job, or kill your sister, brother, neighbor? If I lie to you and say it is safe to swim across the channel and you are attacked by sharks that I knew were there…should you not care? This is what is happening, right now…today. In the consumer products market, we call that fraud and companies can be criminally liable. Republicans want to abolish all consumer protections.<br />
     So let’s describe what a Fascist government or a political party attempting to introduce a Fascist government would look like and see if either or any of our political parties fits that description:<br />
     Allies with big corporations, planning strategy together, interchangeable.<br />
     Works to have control of the political process at all levels, starting with the top down.<br />
     Does not cooperate with and actually tries to undermine other political parties.<br />
     Uses mobs (armed NRA members) and demonstrations, and attempts to make individuals working in other parties afraid of violent reactions.<br />
     Advocates ownership of weapons as a fear factor to intimidate others. (Wayne La Pierre…”the people with the guns make the rules.”)<br />
     Decides what is best for all citizens based on what corporations want.<br />
     Uses “big lie” propaganda technique, of top-down distributed propaganda message for each issue.<br />
      Allies with military on most issues, with ultra-aggressive military posture.<br />
     Total control of the political process is the ultimate goal.<br />
     If any of this seems familiar to you, then you see something “Fascist” in the current political process. Of course, one thing that wasn’t mentioned. Fascists always need someone to stigmatize. In Germany, it was the Jews. In Italy it was the Socialists. In Spain it was the Communists. It seems clear that, in this country it is the Democrats, Immigrants, Latinos, Muslims, Gays, African Americans, the poor&#8230;,<br />
      The Neocons are out of power, but they are unrelenting in their efforts to control as much of the political discourse as possible, no matter how damaging to society. They bring mobs and riff-raff out, some with guns, trying to scare the average citizen. They send messages out over radio with lunatic commentators, some who are not even allowed to visit other countries because of their hate speech…yet we tolerate it.<br />
     We even allow asininely preposterous lies from a possibly psychotic television commentator…to be used to stoke the race-hatred of many tea party members, and thugs against a distinguished African-American President who won 54% of the vote, the largest since Ronald Reagan and who also won the Nobel Peace Prize.<br />
     The case is pretty clear. The Neoconservative Republicans are headed for Fascism if they are not there already. The latest round of insults, threats, lies about conspiracies, demonization of the above mentioned  population plus workers, unions, the unemployed, etc. Sooner  or later this totalitarian attitude will either be denounced or will have serious responses. One thing is sure, with the problems facing our country, we cannot afford the kind of anarchist attacks as were exhibited in the bombing of a Federal building in Oklahoma City or the flying of an aircraft into a building housing an IRS office or the Threats by gun owners to fight the current government to the death.<br />
     This radical, violent, arrogant Fascist attitude has to stop!  The first step in preventing this kind of political outcome is to identify and react to Fascism when it appears. Neoconservative Republicanism is Fascism. Republicans must return to sanity or be treated as a very dangerous and radical political party.<br />
http://www.populistdaily.com/politics/neoconservative-republicans-and-fascism.html<br />
     The last person Repubs want in the White House is another government-expanding “compassionate conservative” like Bush the younger and especially NOT  a black man!<br />
They yearn for a radical who will yank an out-of-control federal government up by its roots, or at least starve it of revenue, prune entitlements, chop away job-strangling regulation like consumer protection or environmental protection and free (or force) citizens to take more individual responsibility for their pensions and health care. Those that can&#8217;t, screw them!<br />
     I think the Republican Party is not really a party. It doesn’t stand for anything except reelecting itself. It’s a coalition of gangs….<br />
      The Neo Cons are only oriented to an aggressive imperialistic foreign policy, a big defense establishment, and suppression of our civil liberties like voting!<br />
     The one positive I can observe about the Republican party is that they are starting to eat their own. If we are lucky they will consume themselves and explode into a bloody mist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Washington State Bridge Collapse Another Reminder Of Need For Massive Infrastructure Investment Without Interference Of Politics! by Princess Leia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21011&#038;cpage=1#comment-87831</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Leia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21011#comment-87831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the info Maggie. People need to wake up and vote those jerks out in 2014!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Maggie. People need to wake up and vote those jerks out in 2014!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Washington State Bridge Collapse Another Reminder Of Need For Massive Infrastructure Investment Without Interference Of Politics! by Juan Domingo Peron</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21011&#038;cpage=1#comment-87830</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Domingo Peron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21011#comment-87830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maggie: What are you on? Please share , don&#039;t be so selfish. Conservatism/classic liberals=limited constitutional Republic. So the admirers of Madison, Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Burke, Locke, are looking to create a fascist nation. Seriously, what are you on? LSD?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggie: What are you on? Please share , don&#8217;t be so selfish. Conservatism/classic liberals=limited constitutional Republic. So the admirers of Madison, Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Burke, Locke, are looking to create a fascist nation. Seriously, what are you on? LSD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Washington State Bridge Collapse Another Reminder Of Need For Massive Infrastructure Investment Without Interference Of Politics! by Maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21011&#038;cpage=1#comment-87829</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21011#comment-87829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further evidence Conservatives are hellbent on destruction of our country.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Republicans are hellbent and will stop at nothing to destroy this country in every way possible. They DON &#039;T wish to conserve anything, they want to destroy this country in order to create the kind of fascist nation they feel will benefit only them!
     There most recent scheme:
House Republicans Pass Unconstitutional Bill Hijacking Obama’s Power Over Keystone XL
----------------------------------http://www.politicususa.com/house-republicans-unconstitutional-action-hijack-obamas-power-keystone-xl.html
----------------------------------_
       As America continues making the transition from a representative democracy to a corporate-controlled fascist state, it is becoming more difficult to have any faith that the minority party in power has any regard whatsoever for this nation or its people, but that is to be expected from Republicans whose raison d’être is empowering corporations. There are few areas of government and policy Republicans have not ceded to their corporate handlers, but none is as blatant and damaging as allowing the corporate oil industry to dictate energy and environmental policy that is having acutely deleterious effects on the people and health of the environment. Part of the problem is a corporate-controlled press that advances the oil industry agenda without opposition, and part is allowing oil industry sycophants to serve in Congress that emboldened them to stage a coup d’état to seize power from the President and warn him to toe the oil industry line or else. A major share of the blame lies solely with the Founding Fathers and their pathetic Constitution that has failed miserably to protect the people from corporate oligarchs even when they are from a foreign nation.
     Two events over the past two days inform that Republicans are employed by a foreign nation’s prime minister and one of its corporations that promises to enrich the GOP’s primary campaign donors’ bottom line regardless the existential threat to the environment and the health and welfare of the American people. On Wednesday, House Republicans took the unprecedented, but not wholly unexpected, step to wrest power from the President of the United States by passing a bill that circumvents the President’s executive power and approved the environment-killing Keystone XL pipeline at the direct order of a foreign corporation and Canada’s prime minister. The Harper government has exerted its formidable power over Republicans to subvert the Constitution to advance a Canadian corporation’s intent to pump 830,000 barrels per day of tar sand bitumen to American refineries en route to South America, China, and Europe.
     Following the Republican practice of blatant lying to enrich and empower corporate control of energy policy, TransCanada spokesman, Shawn Howard, said, “We appreciate the continued support from many members of Congress, who understand the importance of Keystone XL to the American economy,” and that “Keystone XL will be the safest oil pipeline, and it will help make America less reliant on more expensive oil from countries that do not share its interests and values.” TransCanada has reported that the KeystoneXL pipeline will regularly spill tar sand bitumen on American soil, as well as touted contracts already in place to sell every drop of refined tar sand on the foreign export market. Americans will never see or use any of the refined tar, but they will pay more for gas as TransCanada predicted the pipeline will increase the price of fuel at the pump by at least 20-cents per gallon. In fact, the pipeline is so hazardous to the environment that the Canadian government will not allow TransCanada to build the pipeline over Canadian soil to West coast refineries, so they charged Republicans to ignore the Constitution and pass a bill to approve the pipeline’s construction regardless it is the purview of the President of the United States.
     Yesterday, a group of Senate Republicans sent a stern warning to President Obama to approve the pipeline forthwith, and forbade him from including any measures to address climate change the pipeline is certain to exacerbate on a massive scale. Two dozen Senate Republicans cautioned the President that he had better not link one single climate change policy to approval of the proposed Keystone XL oil sands pipeline, and that he dare not “tether its fate to wholly unrelated and economically disastrous new regulatory policies.” Every climate scientist on the planet has warned that developing Canada’s tar sands will increase CO2 emissions to a point it will be “game over for the climate” in spite of the Koch brothers and ExxonMobil report to the State Department that building the pipeline is an environmentally sound endeavor with “manageable” consequences to the environment. Two weeks ago, carbon dioxide (CO2) reached the 400ppm milestone for the first time in at least 800,000 years according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and  climate scientists agree the evidence is conclusive the strong growth of CO2 emissions is from burning coal, oil, and natural gas. 400 ppm is 50 ppm over the threshold scientists claim demands immediate steps to curb fossil fuel emissions or it is game over for the climate; Republicans and their corporate masters could not care less.
     The real issue is not just the devastation inherent in pumping tar bitumen through the pipeline, or that the climate is going to be decimated to expand Canada’s tar industry, but that Republicans have no regard for anything but corporate interests; even  a corporation’s interests. It is true they successfully put the oil industry in charge of energy policy, but they have also given corporations power to dictate policy on every issue affecting the American people and there is little anyone can, or will, do to stop the corporate takeover. The media is wholly owned and operated by corporations pushing agendas hostile to democracy and the American people, and Republicans dutifully enact laws written by corporations through the American Legislative Exchange Council. The recent Senate vote on background checks prior to gun purchases is the perfect example of Republicans giving corporate interests power to subvert the will of 91% of the population to maintain their profits, and it was a portent of democracy’s end and corporate control of government.
     The Founding Fathers could have prevented America’s spiral into corporate fascism, but they likely never imagined Americans would sit idly by and allow their elected representatives to cede the government to corporations. Perhaps the Constitution’s framers believed a free press would inform the people of the impending corporate coup d’état, but corporations own the media and successfully concealed democracy’s demise. It is prescient that the media has never informed the people that Keystone is dangerous and will not provide any oil for Americans, and they will be as guilty as Republicans and the oil industry for climate Armageddon as well as America’s continued slide into corporate oligarchy. It is apropos the corporate oil industry and Republicans will be the undoing of the climate,  because long before they despoil the climate and environment that will make Earth uninhabitable, their effort to destroy American democracy will have reached fruition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further evidence Conservatives are hellbent on destruction of our country.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Republicans are hellbent and will stop at nothing to destroy this country in every way possible. They DON &#8216;T wish to conserve anything, they want to destroy this country in order to create the kind of fascist nation they feel will benefit only them!<br />
     There most recent scheme:<br />
House Republicans Pass Unconstitutional Bill Hijacking Obama’s Power Over Keystone XL<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-http://www.politicususa.com/house-republicans-unconstitutional-action-hijack-obamas-power-keystone-xl.html<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-_<br />
       As America continues making the transition from a representative democracy to a corporate-controlled fascist state, it is becoming more difficult to have any faith that the minority party in power has any regard whatsoever for this nation or its people, but that is to be expected from Republicans whose raison d’être is empowering corporations. There are few areas of government and policy Republicans have not ceded to their corporate handlers, but none is as blatant and damaging as allowing the corporate oil industry to dictate energy and environmental policy that is having acutely deleterious effects on the people and health of the environment. Part of the problem is a corporate-controlled press that advances the oil industry agenda without opposition, and part is allowing oil industry sycophants to serve in Congress that emboldened them to stage a coup d’état to seize power from the President and warn him to toe the oil industry line or else. A major share of the blame lies solely with the Founding Fathers and their pathetic Constitution that has failed miserably to protect the people from corporate oligarchs even when they are from a foreign nation.<br />
     Two events over the past two days inform that Republicans are employed by a foreign nation’s prime minister and one of its corporations that promises to enrich the GOP’s primary campaign donors’ bottom line regardless the existential threat to the environment and the health and welfare of the American people. On Wednesday, House Republicans took the unprecedented, but not wholly unexpected, step to wrest power from the President of the United States by passing a bill that circumvents the President’s executive power and approved the environment-killing Keystone XL pipeline at the direct order of a foreign corporation and Canada’s prime minister. The Harper government has exerted its formidable power over Republicans to subvert the Constitution to advance a Canadian corporation’s intent to pump 830,000 barrels per day of tar sand bitumen to American refineries en route to South America, China, and Europe.<br />
     Following the Republican practice of blatant lying to enrich and empower corporate control of energy policy, TransCanada spokesman, Shawn Howard, said, “We appreciate the continued support from many members of Congress, who understand the importance of Keystone XL to the American economy,” and that “Keystone XL will be the safest oil pipeline, and it will help make America less reliant on more expensive oil from countries that do not share its interests and values.” TransCanada has reported that the KeystoneXL pipeline will regularly spill tar sand bitumen on American soil, as well as touted contracts already in place to sell every drop of refined tar sand on the foreign export market. Americans will never see or use any of the refined tar, but they will pay more for gas as TransCanada predicted the pipeline will increase the price of fuel at the pump by at least 20-cents per gallon. In fact, the pipeline is so hazardous to the environment that the Canadian government will not allow TransCanada to build the pipeline over Canadian soil to West coast refineries, so they charged Republicans to ignore the Constitution and pass a bill to approve the pipeline’s construction regardless it is the purview of the President of the United States.<br />
     Yesterday, a group of Senate Republicans sent a stern warning to President Obama to approve the pipeline forthwith, and forbade him from including any measures to address climate change the pipeline is certain to exacerbate on a massive scale. Two dozen Senate Republicans cautioned the President that he had better not link one single climate change policy to approval of the proposed Keystone XL oil sands pipeline, and that he dare not “tether its fate to wholly unrelated and economically disastrous new regulatory policies.” Every climate scientist on the planet has warned that developing Canada’s tar sands will increase CO2 emissions to a point it will be “game over for the climate” in spite of the Koch brothers and ExxonMobil report to the State Department that building the pipeline is an environmentally sound endeavor with “manageable” consequences to the environment. Two weeks ago, carbon dioxide (CO2) reached the 400ppm milestone for the first time in at least 800,000 years according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and  climate scientists agree the evidence is conclusive the strong growth of CO2 emissions is from burning coal, oil, and natural gas. 400 ppm is 50 ppm over the threshold scientists claim demands immediate steps to curb fossil fuel emissions or it is game over for the climate; Republicans and their corporate masters could not care less.<br />
     The real issue is not just the devastation inherent in pumping tar bitumen through the pipeline, or that the climate is going to be decimated to expand Canada’s tar industry, but that Republicans have no regard for anything but corporate interests; even  a corporation’s interests. It is true they successfully put the oil industry in charge of energy policy, but they have also given corporations power to dictate policy on every issue affecting the American people and there is little anyone can, or will, do to stop the corporate takeover. The media is wholly owned and operated by corporations pushing agendas hostile to democracy and the American people, and Republicans dutifully enact laws written by corporations through the American Legislative Exchange Council. The recent Senate vote on background checks prior to gun purchases is the perfect example of Republicans giving corporate interests power to subvert the will of 91% of the population to maintain their profits, and it was a portent of democracy’s end and corporate control of government.<br />
     The Founding Fathers could have prevented America’s spiral into corporate fascism, but they likely never imagined Americans would sit idly by and allow their elected representatives to cede the government to corporations. Perhaps the Constitution’s framers believed a free press would inform the people of the impending corporate coup d’état, but corporations own the media and successfully concealed democracy’s demise. It is prescient that the media has never informed the people that Keystone is dangerous and will not provide any oil for Americans, and they will be as guilty as Republicans and the oil industry for climate Armageddon as well as America’s continued slide into corporate oligarchy. It is apropos the corporate oil industry and Republicans will be the undoing of the climate,  because long before they despoil the climate and environment that will make Earth uninhabitable, their effort to destroy American democracy will have reached fruition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Religion And Prejudice:  Again Evident In Reaction To Boy Scout Decision to Admit Gay Youths by Princess Leia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009&#038;cpage=1#comment-87828</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Leia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009#comment-87828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From my experiences with the Unitarian faith, I&#039;ve learned that many Unitarian Universalists refer to the denomination as “post-Christian” – that is, coming out of a fully Christian heritage (both the Unitarians and the Universalists were Christians, though not quite “orthodox” ones) but no longer as a group identifying with any particular Christian message about Jesus or God or salvation.

Unitarian Universalists take such labels as Christian and Buddhist as identifiers of PERSONAL belief, philosophy, theology, practice, or committment – rather than as identifiers of the denomination, which can include many different personal identifiers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experiences with the Unitarian faith, I&#8217;ve learned that many Unitarian Universalists refer to the denomination as “post-Christian” – that is, coming out of a fully Christian heritage (both the Unitarians and the Universalists were Christians, though not quite “orthodox” ones) but no longer as a group identifying with any particular Christian message about Jesus or God or salvation.</p>
<p>Unitarian Universalists take such labels as Christian and Buddhist as identifiers of PERSONAL belief, philosophy, theology, practice, or committment – rather than as identifiers of the denomination, which can include many different personal identifiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republican Presidents And Political Scandals&#8211;The Five Greatest Scandals, Unmatched By ANY Democratic Presidential Administration! by Princess Leia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=20991&#038;cpage=2#comment-87827</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Leia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=20991#comment-87827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this was rather thought provoking: http://moderateprogressive.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/ok-you-lost-me/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was rather thought provoking: http://moderateprogressive.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/ok-you-lost-me/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Religion And Prejudice:  Again Evident In Reaction To Boy Scout Decision to Admit Gay Youths by Ronald</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009&#038;cpage=1#comment-87826</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009#comment-87826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Princess Leia, I find it fascinating that you have become a Unitarian, which I consider the most tolerant and open minded Christian religious group!  And I totally agree with your description of abortion as legal, safe, and rare!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Princess Leia, I find it fascinating that you have become a Unitarian, which I consider the most tolerant and open minded Christian religious group!  And I totally agree with your description of abortion as legal, safe, and rare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Religion And Prejudice:  Again Evident In Reaction To Boy Scout Decision to Admit Gay Youths by Princess Leia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009&#038;cpage=1#comment-87825</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Leia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009#comment-87825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As for the original topic concerning gays, here is my belief: All people are created equal. End of discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the original topic concerning gays, here is my belief: All people are created equal. End of discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Religion And Prejudice:  Again Evident In Reaction To Boy Scout Decision to Admit Gay Youths by Princess Leia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009&#038;cpage=1#comment-87824</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Leia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009#comment-87824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was raised Southern Baptist. When I was in my 20s, I and my parents fell out with Southern Baptist beliefs and found our spiritual home in Unitarian Universalism.

As far as politics, like my parents, I am mostly moderate. While I am mostly moderate, like my parents, I also tend to lean slightly left (according to the US spectrum). Therefore, I consider myself to be a moderate progressive.

Anyway, my stance on abortion is this: I think it should be the woman&#039;s right to choose and it should be legal, safe, and rare.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was raised Southern Baptist. When I was in my 20s, I and my parents fell out with Southern Baptist beliefs and found our spiritual home in Unitarian Universalism.</p>
<p>As far as politics, like my parents, I am mostly moderate. While I am mostly moderate, like my parents, I also tend to lean slightly left (according to the US spectrum). Therefore, I consider myself to be a moderate progressive.</p>
<p>Anyway, my stance on abortion is this: I think it should be the woman&#8217;s right to choose and it should be legal, safe, and rare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Religion And Prejudice:  Again Evident In Reaction To Boy Scout Decision to Admit Gay Youths by Princess Leia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009&#038;cpage=1#comment-87823</link>
		<dc:creator>Princess Leia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprogressiveprofessor.com/?p=21009#comment-87823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am pro-choice because I believe in letting women control their own fertility and decide for themselves when they are ready to be a parent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pro-choice because I believe in letting women control their own fertility and decide for themselves when they are ready to be a parent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
